L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
—- Market cap
- $46.25B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.07B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LHX stock price vs EMR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at EMR's multiple
Needs EMR P/E.
Implied fair value · at LHX's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
LHX vs LMT
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
LHX vs NOC
BOEING CO
LHX vs BA
RTX Corp
LHX vs RTX
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
LHX vs GD
HEICO CORP
LHX vs HEI
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
LHX vs HON
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
LHX vs GE
DANAHER CORP /DE/
LHX vs DHR
Eaton Corp plc
LHX vs ETN
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LHX can sustain its faster revenue growth while improving margins toward EMR's level, then LHX looks attractive to accumulate because it already trades at lower valuation multiples and has a stronger balance sheet than EMR.
LHX trades at a discount to EMR on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, and the implied price suggests about 14.2% upside versus the current price. However, the comparison is tempered by LHX's lower margins and the fact that EMR-implied range sits well above both the current price and LHX's historical band.
Supporting Metrics