Leslie’S, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$64.34M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LESL stock price vs ENVX: inconclusive — current versus $2.89K implied using P/S multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ENVX's multiple
Implied fair value · at LESL's multiple
Needs LESL P/S.
Snapshot Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Seven period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 57% equity / 43% debt · EV / Revenue 35.09x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
LESLIE’S, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Enovix Corporation · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LESL can stabilize revenue and avoid further balance-sheet deterioration, then LESL is the better relative-value candidate versus ENVX because it is already priced at a tiny fraction of ENVX's sales multiple while having meaningfully stronger margins and a much larger revenue base.
LESL trades at a massive discount to ENVX on both sales and enterprise-value measures, while its own price is already near the top of the stated historical band. The extreme ENVX-implied value is driven primarily by ENVX's very high P/S and EV/Revenue multiples rather than by any evidence that LESL deserves a rerating to that level.
Supporting Metrics