Leidos Holdings, Inc.
—- Market cap
- $16.26B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.11B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2026 ·
Decision snapshot: LDOS stock price at discount vs NTAP $129.55 current versus $322.10 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NTAP's multiple
Implied fair value · at LDOS's multiple
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Lower P/E
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 94% equity / 6% debt · EV / Revenue 5.85x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 19.69x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
NetApp, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$99.20
Base
$116.73
Bull
$141.38
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
LDOS vs IBM
Accenture plc
LDOS vs ACN
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
LDOS vs LMT
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
LDOS vs NOC
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
LDOS vs GD
ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
LDOS vs ZBRA
Pure Storage, Inc.
LDOS vs PSTG
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
LDOS vs MU
Dell Technologies Inc.
LDOS vs DELL
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
LDOS vs STX
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co
LDOS vs HPE
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe LDOS’s lower-margin business can sustain its current profitability and continue modest growth, then LDOS looks attractive at current levels because it trades well below NTAP on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA while sitting near the low end of its historical valuation band.
LDOS trades at a steep discount to NTAP on earnings, sales, and cash-flow proxies, despite being the larger revenue business. The gap is likely driven by NTAP’s much higher margin profile and growth, but the current pricing still leaves LDOS looking inexpensive versus both NTAP and its own longer-term reference points.
Supporting Metrics