Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: LDOS stock price vs CRWD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CRWD's multiple
Needs CRWD P/E.
Implied fair value · at LDOS's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, LDOS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Leidos Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
LDOS vs IBM
Accenture plc
LDOS vs ACN
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
LDOS vs LMT
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/
LDOS vs NOC
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
LDOS vs GD
ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
LDOS vs ZBRA
MICROSOFT CORP
LDOS vs MSFT
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
LDOS vs CSCO
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD
LDOS vs CHKP
Okta, Inc.
LDOS vs OKTA
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
LDOS vs KEYS
SentinelOne, Inc.
LDOS vs S
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CRWD-style software multiples should not be applied to LDOS's lower-growth, lower-margin government-services profile, then hold or only modestly accumulate LDOS rather than chase CRWD-implied upside, because LDOS already looks reasonable on historical and DCF ranges while its operating growth is only 3.1%.
LDOS trades at 0.8x P/S and 6.7x EV/EBITDA versus CRWD at 10.1x P/S and 1268.3x EV/EBITDA, so the valuation gap is extreme. However, much of that discount is explained by CRWD's much faster revenue growth and LDOS's lower-margin, slower-growth profile.
Supporting Metrics
