Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KSS stock price vs BBCP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BBCP's multiple
Needs BBCP P/E.
Implied fair value · at KSS's multiple
Needs KSS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
KOHL’S CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
CONCRETE PUMPING HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
KSS vs TJX
ROSS STORES, INC.
KSS vs ROST
NORDSTROM INC
KSS vs JWN
Walmart Inc.
KSS vs WMT
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
KSS vs COST
CEMEX SAB DE CV
KSS vs CX
Arcosa, Inc.
KSS vs ACA
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC
KSS vs GVA
Primoris Services Corp
KSS vs PRIM
MASTEC INC
KSS vs MTZ
TUTOR PERINI CORP
KSS vs TPC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KSS can sustain its current earnings base without a major deterioration in margins or leverage, then treat the BBCP-based BBCP valuation as unreliable and avoid extrapolating the $262.33 implied price into an investable upside case because KSS already trades near the top of its historical band and well above the DCF range.
The valuation gap is extreme: KSS trades at 8.4x P/E and 0.1x P/S versus BBCP at 110.2x P/E and 1.3x P/S, which mechanically drives a very large implied price for KSS. However, the implied price of $262.33 sits far outside both KSS’s historical band and DCF range, suggesting BBCP multiple framework is not well anchored to KSS fundamentals.
Supporting Metrics
