Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KRO stock price vs ITW: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ITW's multiple
Needs ITW P/S.
Implied fair value · at KRO's multiple
Needs KRO P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
KRONOS WORLDWIDE, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC · implied price per share
Bear
$71.88
Base
$86.99
Bull
$109.51
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KRO can materially improve margins and earnings quality toward ITW-like levels, then consider KRO because the stock is priced at only 0.4x sales versus ITW's 4.9x; otherwise, avoid treating ITW-implied upside as realistic given KRO's negative profitability and 4/9 Piotroski score.
KRO trades at 0.4x P/S versus ITW at 4.9x, which creates the headline valuation gap and the very large implied upside figure. However, that gap is not directly comparable on quality-adjusted grounds because KRO has negative margins and negative net income while ITW remains highly profitable.
Supporting Metrics
