Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
KR stock price vs EBAY: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | KR | EBAY | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) KR: FY 2025 -> FY 2026 | EBAY: FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | 0.4% | 7.9% | EBAY leads by 95.6% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 51.6% | 71.5% | EBAY leads by 27.8% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 2.0% | 31.7% | EBAY leads by 93.8% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 4.8 | 0.6 | EBAY leads by 653.1% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | KR | Delta vs EBAY | EBAY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $147.64B | 1230.1% higher | $11.10B |
| Gross profit | $76.15B | 860.1% higher | $7.93B |
| Operating income | $1.89B | 17.0% lower | $2.28B |
| EBITDA | $2.88B | 18.1% lower | $3.52B |
| Net income | $1.02B | 50.0% lower | $2.03B |
| EPS | 1.5 | 64.5% lower | 4.3 |
| Revenue growth | 0.4% | 95.6% lower | 7.9% |
| Gross margin | 51.6% | 27.8% lower | 71.5% |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 93.8% lower | 20.5% |
| EBITDA margin | 2.0% | 93.8% lower | 31.7% |
| Net margin | 0.7% | 96.2% lower | 18.3% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
KR screens expensive versus EBAY on weaker profitability and growth, with the implied price of $40.46 sitting 29.9% below the current $57.74 and only modestly inside KR's historical band.
If you believe KR can sustain or expand margins despite 0.4% revenue growth and 4.8x net debt/EBITDA, then hold or add selectively; otherwise, the data favor reducing exposure because the stock trades at 37.5x earnings versus EBAY's 26.3x while implied P/E valuation points 29.9% below the current price.
KR's current price of $57.74 versus an implied P/E-based price of $40.46 suggests meaningful downside of 29.9%. The gap is harder to justify because KR trades at 37.5x P/E versus EBAY's 26.3x despite materially weaker margins and growth.
Supporting Metrics