Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
—- Market cap
- $10.89B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$220.42M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KNX stock price vs UBER: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UBER's multiple
Needs UBER P/E.
Implied fair value · at KNX's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
KNX vs JBHT
WERNER ENTERPRISES INC
KNX vs WERN
FEDEX CORP
KNX vs FDX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
KNX vs UPS
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
KNX vs CAR
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
KNX vs WAB
Lyft, Inc.
KNX vs LYFT
AMAZON COM INC
KNX vs AMZN
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
KNX vs CHRW
DoorDash, Inc.
KNX vs DASH
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KNX can materially accelerate growth and expand profitability from its current 0.8% revenue growth and 0.9% net margin, then consider holding only with caution; otherwise, the data favors reducing exposure because KNX’s 172.7x P/E is difficult to justify relative to UBER and the valuation ranges provided.
KNX’s current price implies a P/E-based value of $5.91 versus $70.81, an indicated downside of 91.7%, suggesting the market is assigning a much higher earnings multiple than UBER comparison supports. The gap is especially stark because KNX trades at 172.7x P/E versus UBER at 14.4x, while KNX’s growth and profitability profile is not stronger enough to justify that premium.
Supporting Metrics