Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
—- Market cap
- $11.22B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$220.42M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KNX stock price vs GATX: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GATX's multiple
Needs GATX P/E.
Implied fair value · at KNX's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
GATX Corporation · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
KNX vs JBHT
WERNER ENTERPRISES INC
KNX vs WERN
FEDEX CORP
KNX vs FDX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
KNX vs UPS
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
KNX vs CAR
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
KNX vs WAB
UNION PACIFIC CORP
KNX vs UNP
CSX CORP
KNX vs CSX
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP
KNX vs NSC
CATERPILLAR INC
KNX vs CAT
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KNX can materially expand margins and re-rate closer to GATX-like earnings multiples, then hold or add selectively because the current P/E-based implied downside is extreme; otherwise, reduce exposure because KNX's profitability, growth, and quality metrics are weaker than GATX's and the stock already trades above the DCF range.
The valuation gap is severe on a P/E basis: KNX trades at 166.9x versus GATX at 19.9x, and the implied price from the P/E multiple is $8.14 versus KNX's current price of $68.42. On the other hand, KNX looks cheaper than GATX on EV/EBITDA and EV/Revenue, so the gap is partly explained by differing capital structures and margin profiles.
Supporting Metrics