Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KIM stock price vs AVB: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AVB's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, AVB P/E.
Implied fair value · at KIM's multiple
Needs KIM P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Kimco Realty Corporation · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
REALTY INCOME CORP
KIM vs O
REGENCY CENTERS CORP
KIM vs REG
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
KIM vs BRX
AGREE REALTY CORP
KIM vs ADC
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
KIM vs EQR
UDR, Inc.
KIM vs UDR
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
KIM vs CPT
MID AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES INC.
KIM vs MAA
American Campus Communities, Inc.
KIM vs ACC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KIM can sustain its 5.1% revenue growth while narrowing the 6.1x net debt/EBITDA gap toward AVB’s 3.7x, then a modest overweight or hold is justified because the stock still trades below AVB on P/E and near the middle of its historical range.
KIM trades at a slight discount to AVB on P/E, with 24.0x versus 25.3x, implying only 5.7% upside to the indicated fair value. That valuation support is tempered by a much weaker EV/EBITDA profile and a price that sits near the middle of the stated historical band.
Supporting Metrics
