Keysight Technologies, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.87B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: KEYS stock price vs A: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at A's multiple
Needs A P/E.
Implied fair value · at KEYS's multiple
Needs KEYS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$41.49
Base
$49.80
Bull
$60.61
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Fortive Corp
KEYS vs FTV
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
KEYS vs TDY
MKS INSTRUMENTS INC
KEYS vs MKSI
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC
KEYS vs ROP
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
KEYS vs TMO
ILLUMINA, INC.
KEYS vs ILMN
BIO-TECHNE Corp
KEYS vs TECH
BRUKER CORP
KEYS vs BRKR
Azenta, Inc.
KEYS vs AZTA
WATERS CORP /DE/
KEYS vs WAT
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe KEYS can sustain a persistent premium despite weaker operating and net margins than A, then hold; otherwise, reduce exposure or avoid new buys because KEYS trades at 65.0x P/E and 36.0x EV/EBITDA versus A’s 30.3x and 21.0x while the implied P/E value is only $148.66.
KEYS trades at a steep premium to A on every major valuation multiple, yet the implied price from the P/E comparison is far below the current price. The gap is driven by KEYS’ much higher multiples rather than a correspondingly superior profitability profile.
Supporting Metrics