Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
KBR stock price vs SE: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Latest stored price
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | KBR | SE | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) KBR: FY 2025 -> FY 2026 | SE: FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | 0.6% | 36.4% | SE leads by 98.4% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 14.8% | 44.7% | SE leads by 66.9% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 12.8% | 12.2% | KBR leads by 4.4% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 2.1 | -3.8 | SE leads by 156.8% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | KBR | Delta vs SE | SE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.79B | 66.1% lower | $22.94B |
| Gross profit | $1.15B | 88.8% lower | $10.24B |
| Operating income | $778.00M | 60.8% lower | $1.99B |
| EBITDA | $994.00M | 64.6% lower | $2.81B |
| Net income | $415.00M | 73.7% lower | $1.58B |
| EPS | 3.2 | 27.4% higher | 2.5 |
| Revenue growth | 0.6% | 98.4% lower | 36.4% |
| Gross margin | 14.8% | 66.9% lower | 44.7% |
| Operating margin | 10.0% | 15.5% higher | 8.7% |
| EBITDA margin | 12.8% | 4.4% higher | 12.2% |
| Net margin | 5.3% | 22.5% lower | 6.9% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
KBR looks cheaper than SE on traditional valuation multiples, but SE’s much faster growth and far higher ROIC offset much of that apparent discount, making the relative case mixed rather than clearly bullish.
If you believe KBR can sustain its current quality profile while closing some of the gap to SE’s valuation without needing SE-like growth, then KBR looks attractive on a P/E basis because the stock is far below SE-implied price and within its historical range; otherwise, SE’s superior growth, ROIC, and margin profile likely justify its premium.
KBR trades at 11.3x P/E versus SE at 41.0x, and the model’s implied price of $131.58 versus the current $36.41 suggests a large upside on a pure relative P/E basis. However, SE also has materially stronger growth and profitability metrics, which helps explain why the market awards it a much richer multiple.
Supporting Metrics