Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
KBR stock price vs JD: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Latest stored price
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | KBR | JD | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) KBR: FY 2025 -> FY 2026 | JD: FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | 0.6% | 17.9% | JD leads by 96.8% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 14.8% | 16.0% | JD leads by 7.9% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 12.8% | 7.0% | KBR leads by 81.7% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 2.1 | 0.9 | JD leads by 128.3% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | KBR | Delta vs JD | JD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.79B | 95.8% lower | $187.20B |
| Gross profit | $1.15B | 96.2% lower | $30.03B |
| Operating income | $778.00M | 96.0% higher | $397.00M |
| EBITDA | $994.00M | 92.4% lower | $13.15B |
| Net income | $415.00M | 87.5% lower | $3.31B |
| EPS | 3.2 | 74.5% higher | 1.8 |
| Revenue growth | 0.6% | 96.8% lower | 17.9% |
| Gross margin | 14.8% | 7.9% lower | 16.0% |
| Operating margin | 10.0% | 4611.7% higher | 0.2% |
| EBITDA margin | 12.8% | 81.7% higher | 7.0% |
| Net margin | 5.3% | 201.5% higher | 1.8% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
KBR screens as cheap versus the P/E-based implied value, but JD comparison is distorted by JD’s very different business model and the fundamentals are mixed rather than outright compelling.
If you believe KBR can sustain its stronger margins and ROIC while avoiding leverage-driven strain, then consider the stock as a reasonable hold-to-buy candidate because its operating quality is better than JD’s and its price is near the historical band, but the P/E-based upside is not a reliable stand-alone signal.
The P/E-based implied price of $314.94 suggests a 765.0% upside from KBR’s current price of $36.41, but that gap is driven by applying JD’s much higher P/E of 98.1x to KBR. On most other valuation measures, KBR looks far less mispriced, with P/S at 0.6x versus JD’s 0.7x and EV/Revenue at 0.9x versus JD’s 0.8x.
Supporting Metrics