Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
KBR stock price vs ITT: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | KBR | ITT | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) KBR: FY 2025 -> FY 2026 | ITT: FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | 0.6% | 8.5% | ITT leads by 93.3% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 14.8% | 35.4% | ITT leads by 58.2% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 12.8% | 21.3% | ITT leads by 40.1% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 2.1 | -1.2 | ITT leads by 275.3% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | KBR | Delta vs ITT | ITT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.79B | 97.7% higher | $3.94B |
| Gross profit | $1.15B | 17.4% lower | $1.39B |
| Operating income | $778.00M | 13.7% higher | $684.50M |
| EBITDA | $994.00M | 18.4% higher | $839.40M |
| Net income | $415.00M | 15.0% lower | $488.00M |
| EPS | 3.2 | 47.5% lower | 6.1 |
| Revenue growth | 0.6% | 93.3% lower | 8.5% |
| Gross margin | 14.8% | 58.2% lower | 35.4% |
| Operating margin | 10.0% | 42.5% lower | 17.4% |
| EBITDA margin | 12.8% | 40.1% lower | 21.3% |
| Net margin | 5.3% | 57.0% lower | 12.4% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
KBR screens as materially cheaper than ITT on earnings and sales multiples, but that discount is offset by weaker margins, slower growth, and materially higher leverage, making the valuation gap look partly justified.
If you believe KBR can sustain its strong quality score while closing the gap on margins and leverage, then the stock looks attractive versus ITT because it trades at a far lower P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA despite decent profitability and a solid F-Score.
KBR trades at a steep discount to ITT on every listed valuation metric, with P/E at 11.3x versus 30.6x, P/S at 0.6x versus 4.2x, and EV/EBITDA at 6.8x versus 18.7x. The implied P/E price of $98.14 suggests 169.5% upside, but KBR’s current price of $36.41 is already within its historical band and below the DCF range, so the gap is large but not fully unsupported by operating quality differences.
Supporting Metrics