Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
K stock price vs KHC: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | K | KHC | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) K: FY 2023 -> FY 2024 | KHC: FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | -2.8% | -3.5% | K leads by 18.7% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 33.6% | 33.3% | K leads by 0.8% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 15.5% | -10.5% | K leads by 248.0% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 2.6 | -6.0 | KHC leads by 143.7% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | K | Delta vs KHC | KHC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.75B | 48.9% lower | $24.94B |
| Gross profit | $4.28B | 48.5% lower | $8.31B |
| Operating income | $1.87B | 140.1% higher | -$4.67B |
| EBITDA | $1.98B | 175.7% higher | -$2.61B |
| Net income | $1.34B | 123.0% higher | -$5.85B |
| EPS | 3.9 | 178.7% higher | -4.9 |
| Revenue growth | -2.8% | 18.7% higher | -3.5% |
| Gross margin | 33.6% | 0.8% higher | 33.3% |
| Operating margin | 14.7% | 178.5% higher | -18.7% |
| EBITDA margin | 15.5% | 248.0% higher | -10.5% |
| Net margin | 10.5% | 144.9% higher | -23.4% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
K looks fundamentally stronger than KHC on profitability and returns, and the valuation anchor implies upside versus the DCF range, though the setup is tempered by multiple missing valuation inputs.
If you believe K can sustain its superior margins and ROIC while KHC's profitability remains impaired, then favor K because the relative valuation framework points above the DCF range and K's operating quality is meaningfully better than KHC's.
The provided KHC-implied price for K is $45.02-$45.02 versus a DCF range of $31.72-$42.91, suggesting the relative valuation framework is modestly above intrinsic value estimates. The gap appears driven less by K's own trading multiple data, which is unavailable, and more by KHC's weak profitability profile, which depresses KHC comparison.
Supporting Metrics