Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: JNPR stock price vs HUBS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HUBS's multiple
Needs HUBS P/E.
Implied fair value · at JNPR's multiple
Needs JNPR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$16.15
Base
$19.35
Bull
$23.51
HubSpot, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
JNPR vs CSCO
Dell Technologies Inc.
JNPR vs DELL
Palo Alto Networks Inc
JNPR vs PANW
Fortinet, Inc.
JNPR vs FTNT
VERISIGN INC/CA
JNPR vs VRSN
Match Group, Inc.
JNPR vs MTCH
Salesforce, Inc.
JNPR vs CRM
ADOBE INC.
JNPR vs ADBE
INTUIT INC.
JNPR vs INTU
Atlassian Corp
JNPR vs TEAM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HUBS can convert its 19.2% revenue growth and 83.8% gross margin into sustained operating leverage, then favor HUBS despite the premium; otherwise, JNPR looks more attractive because it already generates far higher earnings, margins, and ROIC on the data provided.
On the provided P/E basis, HUBS is valued at 235.4x earnings, while JNPR has no listed P/E and an implied price of $202.43 from the supplied model. The gap appears driven by HUBS's higher revenue growth and gross margin, but its current profitability is very thin relative to the multiple.
Supporting Metrics
