Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: JBHT stock price vs LSTR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LSTR's multiple
Needs LSTR P/E.
Implied fair value · at JBHT's multiple
Needs JBHT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
JBHT vs ODFL
WERNER ENTERPRISES INC
JBHT vs WERN
Hub Group, Inc.
JBHT vs HUBG
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
JBHT vs WAB
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
JBHT vs CAR
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
JBHT vs KNX
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
JBHT vs CHRW
SAIA INC
JBHT vs SAIA
RYDER SYSTEM INC
JBHT vs R
ARCBEST CORP /DE/
JBHT vs ARCB
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe JBHT can sustain its stronger margins and avoid further revenue deterioration, then a selective long position makes sense because JBHT is cheaper than LSTR on P/E while maintaining better operating profitability and healthy quality scores.
On a P/E basis, JBHT at 46.7x is below LSTR at 62.9x, suggesting JBHT is cheaper than LSTR for earnings. However, on P/S and EV/EBITDA, JBHT trades at 2.2x and 26.9x versus LSTR at 1.5x and 42.7x, so the relative discount is not uniform and the market is assigning a different quality/leverage profile.
Supporting Metrics
