Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$3.37B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ISRG stock price vs TECH: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TECH's multiple
Needs TECH P/E.
Implied fair value · at ISRG's multiple
Needs ISRG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
BIO-TECHNE CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Johnson & Johnson
ISRG vs JNJ
Abbott Laboratories
ISRG vs ABT
Medtronic plc
ISRG vs MDT
BECTON DICKINSON & CO
ISRG vs BDX
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
ISRG vs TMO
DANAHER CORP /DE/
ISRG vs DHR
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
ISRG vs A
WATERS CORP /DE/
ISRG vs WAT
ILLUMINA, INC.
ISRG vs ILMN
BRUKER CORP
ISRG vs BRKR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ISRG can sustain its 20.5% revenue growth and 29.3% operating margin, then the better action is to favor ISRG over TECH because its profitability, growth, and balance-sheet quality are materially stronger even though valuation signals are mixed.
TECH-implied P/E valuation suggests material upside for ISRG versus the current price, but that comparison is stretched because TECH’s P/E is much higher than ISRG’s despite weaker operating performance. ISRG also trades within its historical band, so the valuation case is more about relative quality than a clear absolute mispricing.
Supporting Metrics