Intrepid Potash, Inc.
—Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
—
Net income / ending assets
—
Efficiency ratio
—
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: IPI stock price vs CME: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CME's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, CME P/E.
Implied fair value · at IPI's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, IPI P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Lower is better
Lower is better
Higher is better
Higher is better
Lower is better
Statements
Reported bank earnings and balances, with each company’s reporting period shown.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
—
Net income / ending assets
—
Efficiency ratio
—
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
—
Net income / ending assets
—
Efficiency ratio
—
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Intrepid Potash, Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
CME GROUP INC. · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
IPI · not enough data.
CME · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MOSAIC CO
IPI vs MOS
Nutrien Ltd.
IPI vs NTR
COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL INC
IPI vs CMP
CVR PARTNERS, LP
IPI vs UAN
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co
IPI vs ADM
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
IPI vs CF
S&P Global Inc.
IPI vs SPGI
Moody's Corporation
IPI vs MCO
MSCI Inc.
IPI vs MSCI
Nasdaq, Inc.
IPI vs NDAQ
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe IPI can materially expand margins and sustain its 17.1% revenue growth, then hold or consider a small position because the market is currently rewarding CME-like earnings quality that IPI does not yet exhibit; otherwise, the valuation gap argues for caution given the -46.3% P/E-based downside.
IPI trades at $33.58 versus an implied P/E-based value of $18.02, indicating a -46.3% downside gap. The gap is driven by IPI's much higher P/E multiple than CME (39.5x vs 21.2x), while its P/S is lower (1.5x vs 2.4x), suggesting the market is paying for earnings that are currently less robust than CME's.
Supporting Metrics