Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: INTU stock price vs MSFT: inconclusive — current versus $443.48 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Implied fair value · at INTU's multiple
Needs INTU P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
INTUIT INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC
INTU vs ADP
PAYCHEX INC
INTU vs PAYX
H&R BLOCK INC
INTU vs HRB
Oracle Corporation
INTU vs ORCL
Apple Inc.
INTU vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
INTU vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
INTU vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
INTU vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
INTU vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
INTU vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe INTU can sustain high-teens growth while holding margins and capital efficiency near current levels, then the stock looks reasonably attractive versus MSFT because INTU trades at lower P/E, P/S, and EV/Revenue multiples despite solid quality scores.
INTU trades at 23.1x P/E versus MSFT at 26.9x, which supports the notion of a relative valuation discount and the stated implied upside of 16.5% to $368.31. However, the discount is smaller on EV/EBITDA and much larger on revenue-based multiples, suggesting the market is already giving INTU less credit for scale and margin structure than MSFT.
Supporting Metrics
