Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ICE stock price vs HOOD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HOOD's multiple
Needs HOOD P/E.
Implied fair value · at ICE's multiple
Needs ICE P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$60.32
Base
$77.03
Bull
$98.79
Robinhood Markets, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CME GROUP INC.
ICE vs CME
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
ICE vs CBOE
NASDAQ, INC.
ICE vs NDAQ
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
ICE vs MKTX
Tradeweb Markets Inc.
ICE vs TW
S&P Global Inc.
ICE vs SPGI
SCHWAB CHARLES CORP
ICE vs SCHW
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
ICE vs IBKR
Coinbase Global, Inc.
ICE vs COIN
Block, Inc.
ICE vs SQ
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
ICE vs PYPL
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ICE can sustain its higher margins while avoiding the distress risk implied by the 0.91 Altman Z-Score, then the stock looks attractive versus HOOD-implied valuation because ICE trades at a much lower P/E than HOOD; if you think growth will dominate valuation, HOOD’s 51.6% revenue growth weakens the relative upside case for ICE.
ICE trades at $152.48 versus a HOOD-implied value of $243.63, implying 59.8% upside on the stated P/E framework. However, HOOD-implied range is effectively a single point, while ICE also sits near the upper end of its historical band and above the top of its DCF range, which tempers the apparent discount signal.
Supporting Metrics
