Hub Group, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$98.25M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HUBG stock price vs SAIA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at SAIA's multiple
Needs SAIA P/E.
Implied fair value · at HUBG's multiple
Needs HUBG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
HUB GROUP, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Saia, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON INC
HUBG vs EXPD
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
HUBG vs JBHT
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC
HUBG vs LSTR
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
HUBG vs ODFL
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
HUBG vs CHRW
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
HUBG vs KNX
RYDER SYSTEM INC
HUBG vs R
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HUBG can re-accelerate growth and meaningfully close the margin and ROIC gap versus SAIA, then HUBG could merit upside from current levels because it already trades at a large discount on earnings and sales multiples; otherwise, the valuation gap looks like a fair reflection of weaker fundamentals.
HUBG trades at a large discount to SAIA on absolute and relative valuation, but the gap is justified by weaker operating performance. The market is paying up for SAIA's higher margins, better growth, and stronger returns on capital.
Supporting Metrics