Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HRMY stock price vs BLK: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BLK's multiple
Needs BLK P/E.
Implied fair value · at HRMY's multiple
Needs HRMY P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Seven period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
HARMONY BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
BlackRock, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc
HRMY vs JAZZ
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
HRMY vs SUPN
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
HRMY vs ITCI
ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC
HRMY vs ACAD
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
HRMY vs VNDA
LivaNova PLC
HRMY vs LIVN
STATE STREET CORP
HRMY vs STT
NORTHERN TRUST CORP
HRMY vs NTRS
PRICE T ROWE GROUP INC
HRMY vs TROW
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
HRMY vs GS
Morgan Stanley
HRMY vs MS
Blackstone Inc.
HRMY vs BX
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HRMY can sustain its 21.5% revenue growth and preserve its high 77.2% gross margin, then HRMY looks attractive at the current price because the market is valuing it well below BLK on both earnings and sales multiples.
HRMY trades well below BLK-derived implied value, with current price $37.28 versus an implied $76.42, suggesting roughly 105.0% upside on the cited P/E framework. The discount is consistent across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, but it is hard to separate valuation opportunity from business-model differences versus BLK.
Supporting Metrics
