H&R Block Inc
—Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
—
Net income / ending assets
—
Efficiency ratio
—
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HRB stock price vs FOUR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at FOUR's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, FOUR P/E.
Implied fair value · at HRB's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, HRB P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Lower is better
Lower is better
Higher is better
Higher is better
Lower is better
Statements
Reported bank earnings and balances, with each company’s reporting period shown.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
—
Net income / ending assets
—
Efficiency ratio
—
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
—
Net income / ending assets
—
Efficiency ratio
—
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
H&R BLOCK INC · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
Shift4 Payments, Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
HRB · not enough data.
FOUR · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HRB's current profitability and valuation gap matter more than FOUR's faster revenue growth, then HRB looks attractive to buy or overweight because it trades at a much lower P/E while posting far stronger margins and net income.
HRB trades at 10.6x P/E versus FOUR at 27.6x, yet the implied price framework suggests 160.8% upside to $121.26 from $46.49. The valuation gap is not supported by operating quality alone because HRB has materially higher margins and net income efficiency than FOUR, while FOUR’s higher growth rate appears to be driving its premium.
Supporting Metrics