Hoft William
—Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Return on equity
—
Return on assets
—
Efficiency ratio
—
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: Hoft William stock price vs BAC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BAC's multiple
Needs EPS (TTM), BAC P/E.
Implied fair value · at Hoft William's multiple
Needs Hoft William P/E.
Engine logicHoft Williamvalued onBAC’smultiple
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Price unavailable
Price unavailable
Lower is better
Lower is better
Higher is better
Higher is better
Lower is better
Statements
Bank-focused income statement and equity metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
SEC periods: Hoft William Latest annual filing · BAC FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity
—
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Return on equity
—
Return on assets
—
Efficiency ratio
—
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity
$232.42B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Return on equity
10.1%
Return on assets
0.9%
Efficiency ratio
59.0%
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
HOFT WILLIAM · implied price per share
Cash flow and years must be positive.
BofA Finance LLC · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Hoft William · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
—
1.20x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
—
-3.80x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
—
$1.09T
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
—
$363.82B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Hoft William vs JPM
Citigroup Inc.
Hoft William vs C
Wells Fargo & Company
Hoft William vs WFC
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Hoft William vs GS
Morgan Stanley
Hoft William vs MS
US BANCORP \DE\
Hoft William vs USB
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Hoft William vs PNC
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP
Hoft William vs TFC
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.