Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HCA stock price vs LULU: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LULU's multiple
Needs LULU P/E.
Implied fair value · at HCA's multiple
Needs HCA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
HCA Healthcare, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$130.81
Base
$187.37
Bull
$261.03
lululemon athletica inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LABCORP HOLDINGS INC.
HCA vs LH
WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES INC
HCA vs WST
BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC
HCA vs BAX
MCKESSON CORP
HCA vs MCK
Cigna Group
HCA vs CI
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
HCA vs UNH
Nike, Inc.
HCA vs NKE
Under Armour, Inc.
HCA vs UA
V F CORP
HCA vs VFC
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORP
HCA vs DECK
FOOT LOCKER, INC.
HCA vs FL
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR CO
HCA vs COLM
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HCA can sustain 7%+ revenue growth while closing some of the profitability gap to LULU, then HCA can be considered for valuation support because it already trades below its DCF range and within its historical band; otherwise, the current premium to LULU implied range looks hard to justify on relative earnings quality.
HCA's current price of $410.50 is below the historical band midpoint and well below the DCF range, but it is also above LULU implied range midpoint, creating a split signal. On relative multiples, HCA trades at a higher P/E than LULU despite similar EV/EBITDA, which suggests the market is rewarding LULU's quality profile while assigning HCA a steadier but less attractive growth/return profile.
Supporting Metrics
