HCA Healthcare, Inc.
$140.22B- Market cap
- $94.77B
- Debt
- +$46.49B
- Cash
- −$1.04B
Capital structure 67% equity / 33% debt · EV / Revenue 1.85x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $94.77B · View financials
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 10:06 AM ET
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: HCA stock price vs BIIB: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at BIIB's multiple
Needs BIIB P/E.
Implied fair value · at HCA's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
13 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Capital structure 67% equity / 33% debt · EV / Revenue 1.85x
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
HCA Healthcare, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$171.11
Base
$241.68
Bull
$336.89
BIOGEN INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
LABCORP HOLDINGS INC.
HCA vs LH
WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES INC
HCA vs WST
BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC
HCA vs BAX
MCKESSON CORP
HCA vs MCK
Cigna Group
HCA vs CI
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
HCA vs UNH
PFIZER INC
HCA vs PFE
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
HCA vs JNJ
AMGEN INC
HCA vs AMGN
ELI LILLY & Co
HCA vs LLY
Natera, Inc.
HCA vs NTRA
ILLUMINA, INC.
HCA vs ILMN
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HCA can sustain its 7.1% revenue growth while maintaining at least its current margin profile, then HCA looks attractive versus BIIB because it trades at a materially lower P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue despite being the stronger grower.
HCA trades at a clear valuation discount to BIIB on both earnings and sales bases, while the modelled P/E implied price suggests meaningful upside. The gap is supported by HCA's lower P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, even though BIIB has somewhat better profitability margins.
Supporting Metrics