Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: HAYW stock price vs IR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at IR's multiple
Needs IR P/E.
Implied fair value · at HAYW's multiple
Needs HAYW P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Hayward Holdings, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
SMITH A O CORP
HAYW vs AOS
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC
HAYW vs LII
Johnson Controls International plc
HAYW vs JCI
AAON, INC.
HAYW vs AAON
Trane Technologies plc
HAYW vs TT
Parker-Hannifin Corp
HAYW vs PH
FLOWSERVE CORP
HAYW vs FLS
ITT INC.
HAYW vs ITT
GRACO INC
HAYW vs GGG
DOVER Corp
HAYW vs DOV
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe HAYW can sustain its stronger margins and mid-single-digit growth while the market rerates it closer to IR multiples, then HAYW looks attractive to accumulate because it trades well below IR on P/E and EV/EBITDA despite stronger profitability.
HAYW trades at a large discount to IR-implied value of $23.14-$42.51, with an implied upside of 164.1% versus the current price of $15.67. The gap is driven by IR’s much richer multiples, especially 60.9x P/E and 23.7x EV/EBITDA versus HAYW at 23.0x P/E and 13.3x EV/EBITDA.
Supporting Metrics
