Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: GTX stock price vs HTZ: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at HTZ's multiple
Needs HTZ P/E.
Implied fair value · at GTX's multiple
Needs EPS (TTM) is negative, GTX P/E.
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple discount
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: GTX FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · HTZ FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 79% equity / 21% debt · EV / Revenue 1.81x · EV / EBITDA 11.05x
Capital structure 4% equity / 96% debt · EV / Revenue 2.02x
HTZ carries the larger enterprise value at $17.22B against $6.48B; GTX trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (1.81x vs 2.02x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Garrett Motion Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
-1.77x
-37.15x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
2.12x
-26.30x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$177.00M
$565.00M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BORGWARNER INC
GTX vs BWA
AUTOLIV INC
GTX vs ALV
DANA INC
GTX vs DAN
MODINE MANUFACTURING CO
GTX vs MOD
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS INC
GTX vs AXL
LEAR CORP
GTX vs LEA
U-Haul Holding Co /NV/
GTX vs UHAL
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.
GTX vs PAG
HERC HOLDINGS INC
GTX vs HRI
RYDER SYSTEM INC
GTX vs R
$1.42B
$17.05B
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.
