Garmin Ltd
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$2.28B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: GRMN stock price vs MSFT: inconclusive — current versus $231.44 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Implied fair value · at GRMN's multiple
Needs GRMN P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
GARMIN LTD · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MICROSOFT CORP · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Apple Inc.
GRMN vs AAPL
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
GRMN vs TDY
Fossil Group, Inc.
GRMN vs FOSL
TRIMBLE INC.
GRMN vs TRMB
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
GRMN vs HON
Alphabet Inc.
GRMN vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
GRMN vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
GRMN vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
GRMN vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
GRMN vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GRMN deserves a premium multiple despite trading above its DCF range and richer than MSFT on P/E, then hold or avoid adding; otherwise, consider trimming because the current price implies -21.2% downside to MSFT-based valuation and GRMN's margins and ROIC do not match MSFT's.
At $293.78, GRMN trades above the DCF range and near the top of its historical valuation band, but still below the upper end of MSFT-implied range. The implied price of $231.44 versus the current price indicates a -21.2% downside on the selected P/E framework, suggesting the market is already assigning GRMN a richer multiple than its fundamentals justify.
Supporting Metrics