Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: GILD stock price vs AOS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AOS's multiple
Needs AOS P/E.
Implied fair value · at GILD's multiple
Needs GILD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
A. O. Smith Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AbbVie Inc.
GILD vs ABBV
AMGEN INC
GILD vs AMGN
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO
GILD vs BMY
Merck & Co., Inc.
GILD vs MRK
PFIZER INC
GILD vs PFE
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
GILD vs REGN
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC
GILD vs WTS
Mueller Water Products, Inc.
GILD vs MWA
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC
GILD vs LII
Avery Dennison Corp
GILD vs AVY
LEGGETT & PLATT INC
GILD vs LEG
METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL INC/
GILD vs MTD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GILD can sustain its 78.8% gross margin and 34.0% operating margin while keeping leverage near 1.5x net debt/EBITDA, then the stock can justify some premium; otherwise, the current price looks hard to support versus the $105.89 implied valuation.
GILD trades at a clear premium to AOS across P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, so the market is paying up for GILD’s higher profitability and larger scale. Even with those quality advantages, the valuation work implies downside of 18.7% versus the current price.
Supporting Metrics
