Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: GD stock price vs TTC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TTC's multiple
Needs TTC P/E.
Implied fair value · at GD's multiple
Needs GD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$153.15
Base
$183.87
Bull
$223.89
THE TORO COMPANY · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
GD vs HII
Lockheed Martin Corporation
GD vs LMT
Northrop Grumman Corporation
GD vs NOC
The Boeing Company
GD vs BA
RTX Corp
GD vs RTX
TEXTRON INC
GD vs TXT
DEERE & CO
GD vs DE
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.
GD vs SWK
SMITH A O CORP
GD vs AOS
SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO
GD vs SMG
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GD can sustain double-digit revenue growth while maintaining its current leverage profile, then GD looks attractive versus TTC because it trades at a lower P/E and has a stronger growth and balance-sheet profile despite some mixed margin metrics.
GD trades at 24.8x P/E versus TTC at 29.0x, while the implied price of $447.76 suggests 16.8% upside from the current $383.42. The valuation case is supported by GD’s stronger revenue growth and lower balance-sheet leverage, though TTC still screens slightly better on EV/EBITDA.
Supporting Metrics
