Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: GD stock price vs GE: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GE's multiple
Needs GE P/E.
Implied fair value · at GD's multiple
Needs GD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
14 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$153.15
Base
$183.87
Bull
$223.89
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
GD vs HII
Lockheed Martin Corporation
GD vs LMT
Northrop Grumman Corporation
GD vs NOC
The Boeing Company
GD vs BA
RTX Corp
GD vs RTX
TEXTRON INC
GD vs TXT
MORGAN STANLEY
GD vs MS
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
GD vs EMR
3M CO
GD vs MMM
CUMMINS INC
GD vs CMI
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
GD vs HON
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe GD can sustain its lower leverage while narrowing the gap in growth and margins versus GE, then GD looks attractive on relative valuation because its P/E and P/S are far below GE’s despite solid quality and a strong balance sheet.
GD looks cheap relative to GE on earnings and sales multiples, with a 24.7x P/E and 2.0x P/S versus GE’s 44.8x P/E and 8.2x P/S. However, GE’s stronger growth and much higher margins help explain why the market awards it a richer multiple.
Supporting Metrics
