Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: GD stock price vs AXON: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AXON's multiple
Needs AXON P/E.
Implied fair value · at GD's multiple
Needs GD P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$153.15
Base
$183.87
Bull
$223.89
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$20.24
Base
$24.20
Bull
$29.36
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
GD vs HII
Lockheed Martin Corporation
GD vs LMT
Northrop Grumman Corporation
GD vs NOC
The Boeing Company
GD vs BA
RTX Corp
GD vs RTX
TEXTRON INC
GD vs TXT
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
GD vs TYL
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
GD vs TDY
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
GD vs HWM
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AXON can sustain its premium multiples despite negative operating margin and negative ROIC, then avoid anchoring on AXON-implied price for GD; otherwise, GD looks preferable on relative valuation because it is far cheaper on P/E and P/S while also generating stronger earnings and returns.
AXON trades at a very large premium to GD despite weaker current profitability, which is why the implied price output is extremely elevated. GD’s current price sits near the upper end of its historical band, but AXON-implied range based on AXON is far above both the market price and GD’s DCF range, suggesting the comparison is more reflective of AXON’s growth multiple than GD’s fundamentals.
Supporting Metrics
