Quick read
Fair Value Engine
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot
FUL stock price vs W: inconclusive
Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Price gap
N/A
Coverage
Medium · 60%
Free account · revisit it from your workspace
Quick read
Decision-focused synthesis of expected stock prices combining relative peer multiples and intrinsic models.
Latest stored price
Metric-by-metric
Filter, sort, and scan where each company leads, where gaps are small, and where comparisons are not meaningful.
| Metric | FUL | W | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
Revenue growth (YoY) FY 2024 -> FY 2025 | -2.7% | 5.1% | W leads by 152.1% Higher Revenue growth |
Gross margin | 31.1% | 30.2% | FUL leads by 2.9% Higher Gross margin |
EBITDA margin | 15.3% | 1.9% | FUL leads by 696.5% Higher EBITDA margin |
EV/Revenue | N/M | N/M | Insufficient data No additional context |
P/E | N/M | N/M | Not comparable Not comparable |
Net debt / EBITDA | 3.6 | 7.4 | FUL leads by 51.4% Lower Net debt / EBITDA |
Statements
Core income statement and balance sheet metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
| Metric | FUL | Delta vs W | W |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.47B | 72.1% lower | $12.46B |
| Gross profit | $1.08B | 71.3% lower | $3.77B |
| Operating income | $348.22M | 1948.4% higher | $17.00M |
| EBITDA | $529.95M | 122.1% higher | $238.60M |
| Net income | $151.97M | 148.6% higher | -$313.00M |
| EPS | 2.8 | 212.7% higher | -2.4 |
| Revenue growth | -2.7% | 152.1% lower | 5.1% |
| Gross margin | 31.1% | 2.9% higher | 30.2% |
| Operating margin | 10.0% | 7245.8% higher | 0.1% |
| EBITDA margin | 15.3% | 696.5% higher | 1.9% |
| Net margin | 4.4% | 274.1% higher | -2.5% |
Trendline
Track multi-year revenue, earnings, and margin direction before underwriting a rerating.
Price framework
Market cap + debt - cash, shown for the current pair and benchmark median context.
Price framework
Baseline discounted cash flow model estimating total intrinsic firm value first, then bridging to an implied stock price per share.
Risk control
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Comparable set
Place both companies in context relative to a wider comparable universe.
LLM-powered Synthesis
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
FUL screens as the higher-quality business versus W on profitability and balance sheet, but the valuation edge is only modest at the current P/S-based implied upside of 6.9%.
If you believe FUL can stabilize revenue and preserve its 10.0% operating margin, then holding or modestly accumulating makes sense because the stock already embeds only 6.9% implied upside and sits within both the DCF and historical valuation ranges.
FUL trades close to fair value versus W-based implied price, with the current $58.08 share price sitting below the $62.12 implied price by 6.9%. The valuation signal is supported by FUL's stronger profitability profile, but the gap is not wide enough to call it a clear mispricing.
Supporting Metrics