Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FTI stock price vs EPD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at EPD's multiple
Needs EPD P/E.
Implied fair value · at FTI's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, FTI P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
TechnipFMC plc · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED/NV
FTI vs SLB
Baker Hughes Co
FTI vs BKR
HALLIBURTON CO
FTI vs HAL
NOV Inc.
FTI vs NOV
Weatherford International plc
FTI vs WFRD
WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.
FTI vs WMB
ONEOK INC /NEW/
FTI vs OKE
Energy Transfer LP
FTI vs ET
KINDER MORGAN, INC.
FTI vs KMI
Targa Resources Corp.
FTI vs TRGP
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FTI can sustain its higher growth and quality profile while maintaining current margin strength, then hold or selectively accumulate only on weakness because the stock already trades well above EPD-implied and DCF values despite strong operating metrics.
FTI’s current price of $66.75 is well above both EPD-implied range of $33.87-$37.66 and the DCF range of $26.32-$35.61, implying meaningful downside on those frameworks. However, the stock is still within its historical band of $60.08-$73.43, so the market appears to be pricing FTI closer to its own recent trading history than to EPD or DCF valuation.
Supporting Metrics
