Fox Corp
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FOXA stock price vs ZBRA: inconclusive — current versus $164.48 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ZBRA's multiple
Implied fair value · at FOXA's multiple
Needs FOXA P/E.
Snapshot Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Fox Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Zebra Technologies Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Sinclair, Inc.
FOXA vs SBGI
TEGNA INC
FOXA vs TGNA
COMCAST CORP
FOXA vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
FOXA vs DIS
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
FOXA vs WBD
Paramount Global
FOXA vs PARA
NEXTERA ENERGY INC
FOXA vs NEE
COGNEX CORP
FOXA vs CGNX
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
FOXA vs WBA
Avery Dennison Corp
FOXA vs AVY
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
FOXA vs LDOS
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
FOXA vs MU
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FOXA can sustain its current margins while narrowing ZBRA’s growth and quality advantages, then consider FOXA because the stock is priced far below ZBRA on every major valuation multiple despite stronger EBITDA and net margins on the data provided.
FOXA trades at a sharp discount to ZBRA on P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, which mechanically supports a large implied upside in this framework. However, the valuation gap is not purely a mispricing signal because ZBRA also shows superior growth and returns-based quality metrics.
Supporting Metrics