Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FOXA stock price vs GTX: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GTX's multiple
Needs GTX P/E.
Implied fair value · at FOXA's multiple
Needs FOXA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Fox Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Garrett Motion Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Sinclair, Inc.
FOXA vs SBGI
TEGNA INC
FOXA vs TGNA
COMCAST CORP
FOXA vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
FOXA vs DIS
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
FOXA vs WBD
Paramount Global
FOXA vs PARA
BORGWARNER INC
FOXA vs BWA
AUTOLIV INC
FOXA vs ALV
DANA INC
FOXA vs DAN
MODINE MANUFACTURING CO
FOXA vs MOD
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS INC
FOXA vs AXL
LEAR CORP
FOXA vs LEA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FOXA’s stronger growth and profitability will persist, then FOXA looks attractive relative to GTX because it is trading at materially lower P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue multiples despite superior revenue growth and margins.
FOXA trades at a clear valuation discount to GTX on every provided relative multiple, especially on P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue. The current price of $58.23 also sits below both the implied price of $100.62 and the upper end of the historical band, suggesting the market is not fully pricing FOXA’s stronger profitability and growth profile.
Supporting Metrics
