Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FOXA stock price vs AAPL: inconclusive — current versus $139.94 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AAPL's multiple
Implied fair value · at FOXA's multiple
Needs FOXA P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 98% equity / 2% debt · EV / Revenue 9.68x · EV proxy / EBITDA proxy 27.84x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Fox Corp · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Apple Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$102.98
Base
$125.76
Bull
$143.55
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Sinclair, Inc.
FOXA vs SBGI
TEGNA INC
FOXA vs TGNA
COMCAST CORP
FOXA vs CMCSA
Walt Disney Co
FOXA vs DIS
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
FOXA vs WBD
Paramount Global
FOXA vs PARA
MICROSOFT CORP
FOXA vs MSFT
Alphabet Inc.
FOXA vs GOOGL
Meta Platforms, Inc.
FOXA vs META
NVIDIA CORP
FOXA vs NVDA
INTEL CORP
FOXA vs INTC
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
FOXA vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FOXA's faster revenue growth and current historical-range pricing can persist without a major margin reset, then FOXA looks attractive versus AAPL on relative valuation; if you require AAPL-like profitability and capital efficiency, then the discount is justified and the shares should be treated as fairly valued rather than obviously cheap.
FOXA trades at 12.0x P/E versus AAPL at 36.4x, and at 1.9x EV/EBITDA versus 29.9x for AAPL, implying a large relative valuation discount. The gap is also visible on EV/Revenue, where FOXA is 0.4x versus AAPL at 10.8x, but the comparison is distorted by the companies' very different scale and business models.
Supporting Metrics
