Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2026 · View financials
Decision snapshot: FITB stock price vs LRCX: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LRCX's multiple
Needs LRCX P/E.
Implied fair value · at FITB's multiple
Needs FITB P/E.
Live quote
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Lower is better
Lower is better
Profitability lag
Asset efficiency lag
Lower is better
Statements
Bank-focused income statement and equity metrics aligned to the reporting windows.
SEC periods: FITB FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · LRCX FY 2026 (ended Jun 28, 2026). Fiscal years are not aligned.
Trendline
Six fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity
$16.71B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Return on equity
11.6%
Return on assets
1.2%
Efficiency ratio
57.1%
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity
$10.57B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Return on equity
58.3%
Return on assets
30.9%
Efficiency ratio
—
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$55.13
Base
$64.85
Bull
$74.58
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.67x
0.30x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
-1.92x
-0.49x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$36.03B
$8.15B
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
$14.52B
$3.72B
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
FITB vs JPM
Bank of America Corporation
FITB vs BAC
Wells Fargo & Company
FITB vs WFC
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
FITB vs PNC
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP
FITB vs TFC
Applied Materials, Inc.
FITB vs AMAT
KLA CORP
FITB vs KLAC
ASML HOLDING NV
FITB vs ASML
TERADYNE, INC
FITB vs TER
ENTEGRIS INC
FITB vs ENTG
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.
