Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FFIV stock price vs MSFT: inconclusive — current versus $317.92 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MSFT's multiple
Implied fair value · at FFIV's multiple
Needs FFIV P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
F5, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC
FFIV vs AKAM
Fastly, Inc.
FFIV vs FSLY
Palo Alto Networks Inc
FFIV vs PANW
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC
FFIV vs DGII
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
FFIV vs JNPR
VERISIGN INC/CA
FFIV vs VRSN
Apple Inc.
FFIV vs AAPL
Alphabet Inc.
FFIV vs GOOGL
AMAZON COM INC
FFIV vs AMZN
ADOBE INC.
FFIV vs ADBE
NVIDIA CORP
FFIV vs NVDA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
FFIV vs CSCO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FFIV can sustain premium margins and reaccelerate growth toward a stronger MSFT-like profile, then holding or adding may be reasonable because the balance sheet is strong and quality scores are high; otherwise, MSFT-based valuation suggests limited upside from current levels.
FFIV trades at a 34.1x P/E versus MSFT at 26.9x, yet the implied price from MSFT multiple is $317.92, or 21.0% below the current price of $402.57. The valuation premium is hard to justify purely on growth since FFIV is growing revenue slower than MSFT.
Supporting Metrics
