Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FDX stock price vs ROST: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ROST's multiple
Needs ROST P/E.
Implied fair value · at FDX's multiple
Needs FDX P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
FEDEX CORP · implied price per share
Bear
$134.20
Base
$166.61
Bull
$208.83
Ross Stores, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
FDX vs UPS
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
FDX vs CHRW
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
FDX vs JBHT
EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON INC
FDX vs EXPD
TJX COMPANIES INC /DE/
FDX vs TJX
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
FDX vs WBA
NORDSTROM INC
FDX vs JWN
Macy's, Inc.
FDX vs M
DILLARD'S, INC.
FDX vs DDS
TARGET CORP
FDX vs TGT
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FDX can materially accelerate growth and expand margins toward ROST-like levels, then ROST-based upside becomes more credible; otherwise, the current premium to DCF and only mid-tier quality metrics argue for caution rather than aggressive buying.
FDX trades at a large valuation discount to ROST on both earnings and sales multiples, which explains the high implied upside in ROST-based model. However, the gap looks less like obvious mispricing and more like compensation for FDX’s lower profitability and slower growth.
Supporting Metrics
