Factset Research Systems Inc.
—Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
-$1.01B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
27.3%
Net income / ending assets
13.9%
Efficiency ratio
—
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FDS stock price vs JPM: inconclusive — current versus $250.28 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at JPM's multiple
Implied fair value · at FDS's multiple
Needs FDS P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Filter, sort, and scan the equity metrics that matter most for banks: book value, tangible book, returns, and operating efficiency.
Lower is better
Lower is better
Profitability edge
Asset efficiency edge
Lower is better
Statements
Reported bank earnings and balances, with each company’s reporting period shown.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
Tangible book and profitability anchor a bank, not enterprise value.
Deposits and cash-like balances distort enterprise value for banks, so this section reads equity value, tangible book and profitability instead.
Price / book
Market cap
—
Tangible equity (USD)
-$1.01B
Price / tangible book
—
Price / book
—
Net income / ending equity
27.3%
Net income / ending assets
13.9%
Efficiency ratio
—
Price / tangible book
Market cap
$856.52B
Tangible equity (USD)
$307.11B
Price / tangible book
2.79x
Price / book
2.36x
Net income / ending equity
15.7%
Net income / ending assets
1.3%
Efficiency ratio
52.4%
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO · implied price per share
Bank model off — standard DCF modelling is disabled for financial institutions.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider banking comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MOODYS CORP /DE/
FDS vs MCO
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
FDS vs MKTX
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
FDS vs GPN
FISERV INC
FDS vs FI
JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC
FDS vs JKHY
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
FDS vs PYPL
Bank of America Corporation
FDS vs BAC
Citigroup Inc.
FDS vs C
Wells Fargo & Company
FDS vs WFC
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
FDS vs GS
Morgan Stanley
FDS vs MS
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
FDS vs PNC
US BANCORP \DE\
FDS vs USB
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FDS can maintain above-JPM growth and preserve its strong ROIC while the market re-rates it closer to the upper end of its historical band, then hold or accumulate selectively because the current price is only modestly above the DCF range but supported by stronger revenue growth and gross margin than JPM.
On the provided P/E framework, FDS is priced below the implied value at $274.58 versus $250.28, indicating an 8.9% downside from the model. However, the valuation picture is not one-sided because FDS also trades at a lower P/S multiple than JPM, which can support a relative value argument.
Supporting Metrics