Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FDS stock price vs DE: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at DE's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, DE P/E.
Implied fair value · at FDS's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, FDS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
DEERE & CO · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
FDS · not enough data.
DE · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MOODYS CORP /DE/
FDS vs MCO
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
FDS vs MKTX
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
FDS vs GPN
FISERV INC
FDS vs FI
JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC
FDS vs JKHY
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
FDS vs PYPL
CATERPILLAR INC
FDS vs CAT
AGCO CORP /DE
FDS vs AGCO
TORO CO
FDS vs TTC
TITAN INTERNATIONAL INC
FDS vs TWI
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FDS can sustain its higher margins and 5.4% revenue growth while maintaining ROIC of 22.5%, then FDS looks attractive relative to DE because the stock trades at only 16.1x P/E versus DE's 33.6x despite stronger operating quality.
FDS trades at 16.1x P/E versus DE at 33.6x, yet the implied price from the P/E comparison is $522.20 versus FDS's current $250.09, suggesting a large earnings-multiple gap. The setup is supported by FDS's stronger profitability and balance sheet metrics, while the current price still sits below DE-implied range and within the historical band.
Supporting Metrics
