Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: FDS stock price vs D: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at D's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, D P/E.
Implied fair value · at FDS's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, FDS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
DOMINION ENERGY, INC · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
FDS · not enough data.
D · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
MOODYS CORP /DE/
FDS vs MCO
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC
FDS vs MKTX
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
FDS vs GPN
FISERV INC
FDS vs FI
JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC
FDS vs JKHY
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
FDS vs PYPL
NEXTERA ENERGY INC
FDS vs NEE
EXELON CORP
FDS vs EXC
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO INC
FDS vs AEP
CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC
FDS vs ED
ENTERGY CORP /DE/
FDS vs ETR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe FDS can sustain its current profitability and capital discipline, then the relative case favors owning FDS because it is priced below D-implied value while exhibiting superior margins, ROIC, and leverage versus D.
FDS trades at $250.09 versus an implied price of $314.38, suggesting 25.7% upside on D-based P/E framework. The gap is supported by FDS's lower P/E of 16.1x versus D's 20.2x and much lower EV/EBITDA of 10.4x versus 19.3x.
Supporting Metrics
