Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: F stock price vs WMT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WMT's multiple
Needs Revenue / share.
Implied fair value · at F's multiple
Needs F P/S.
Snapshot Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 95% equity / 5% debt · EV / Revenue 1.22x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Ford Motor Co · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
WALMART INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$26.01
Base
$31.42
Bull
$38.87
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
General Motors Co
F vs GM
Tesla, Inc.
F vs TSLA
Stellantis N.V.
F vs STLA
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/
F vs TM
HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
F vs HMC
Lucid Group, Inc.
F vs LCID
TARGET CORP
F vs TGT
Costco Wholesale Corporation
F vs COST
Amazon.com, Inc.
F vs AMZN
CVS Health Corporation
F vs CVS
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
F vs WBA
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP
F vs DG
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe F can materially improve margins and avoid distress suggested by the 0.81 Altman Z-Score, then F may be worth holding despite the low multiples; otherwise, the data support avoiding a bullish relative valuation call because the discount is justified by weak profitability and quality.
F trades at a deep valuation discount to WMT on both earnings and sales-based measures, but the gap is consistent with F's weaker operating performance. The implied price of $58.74 is far above F's current price of $13.36, yet F's own historical band is only $11.81-$14.43, suggesting the stock already trades near its recent range rather than near WMT-derived fair value.
Supporting Metrics
