Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EXP stock price vs WMT: inconclusive — current versus $537.05 implied using P/E multiple.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WMT's multiple
Implied fair value · at EXP's multiple
Needs EXP P/E.
Close Dec 31, 2025
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Ten period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Capital structure 95% equity / 5% debt · EV / Revenue 1.29x
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EAGLE MATERIALS INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Walmart Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$26.01
Base
$31.42
Bull
$38.87
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Vulcan Materials CO
EXP vs VMC
CEMEX SAB DE CV
EXP vs CX
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
EXP vs MLM
CRH PUBLIC LTD CO
EXP vs CRH
TARGET CORP
EXP vs TGT
Costco Wholesale Corporation
EXP vs COST
Amazon.com, Inc.
EXP vs AMZN
CVS Health Corporation
EXP vs CVS
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
EXP vs WBA
DOLLAR GENERAL CORP
EXP vs DG
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EXP can sustain its much higher margins and ROIC while keeping leverage contained, then EXP looks attractive on a relative valuation basis because it trades at a far lower P/E than WMT despite stronger profitability.
On a P/E basis, EXP is much cheaper than WMT at 15.6x versus 40.8x, which is the main driver behind the large implied upside. The market is also paying less for EXP on EV/EBITDA and EV/Revenue, suggesting the current price already embeds a meaningful discount relative to WMT.
Supporting Metrics
