Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EW stock price vs TMO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TMO's multiple
Needs TMO P/E.
Implied fair value · at EW's multiple
Needs EW P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
ABBOTT LABORATORIES
EW vs ABT
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
EW vs JNJ
Medtronic plc
EW vs MDT
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP
EW vs BSX
BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC
EW vs BAX
DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc.
EW vs XRAY
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
EW vs A
DANAHER CORP /DE/
EW vs DHR
Illumina, Inc.
EW vs ILMN
BRUKER CORP
EW vs BRKR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EW can sustain double-digit growth and premium margins without mean reversion, then hold or accumulate on weakness because EW’s fundamentals are stronger than TMO’s despite the valuation premium; if growth slows, the current 51.6x P/E leaves significant downside risk.
EW is priced at a much richer multiple than TMO on every provided valuation metric, despite TMO being the larger and more diversified company. The current price of $94.37 sits above the top end of TMO-implied range and well above the DCF range, suggesting the market is already discounting a strong growth and quality profile.
Supporting Metrics
