Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ETR stock price vs CHTR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs CHTR P/E.
Implied fair value · at ETR's multiple
Needs ETR P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
ENTERGY CORP /DE/ · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
NEXTERA ENERGY INC
ETR vs NEE
Duke Energy CORP
ETR vs DUK
SOUTHERN CO
ETR vs SO
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
ETR vs D
EXELON CORP
ETR vs EXC
COMCAST CORP
ETR vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
ETR vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
ETR vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
ETR vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
ETR vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
ETR vs CLFD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ETR’s stronger growth and margin profile will persist and its own historical/DCF ranges better reflect fair value than CHTR-implied valuation, then hold or selectively add rather than sell, because the current price is inside both the historical band and DCF range despite the steep CHTR-based discount signal.
ETR trades at a large apparent premium to CHTR: 27.5x P/E versus 4.0x, 3.8x P/S versus 0.7x, and 13.0x EV/EBITDA versus 6.3x. The model’s implied price of $15.66 suggests an 85.5% downside from the current $107.62, but that gap is mechanically driven by the relative multiple comparison and should be interpreted cautiously given the different sectors and capital structures.
Supporting Metrics
