Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: EQIX stock price vs CSCO: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CSCO's multiple
Needs CSCO P/E.
Implied fair value · at EQIX's multiple
Needs EQIX P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
EQUINIX INC · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$32.30
Base
$38.62
Bull
$46.85
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.
EQIX vs DLR
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
EQIX vs AMT
CROWN CASTLE INC.
EQIX vs CCI
IRON MOUNTAIN INC
EQIX vs IRM
CIENA CORP
EQIX vs CIEN
Palo Alto Networks Inc
EQIX vs PANW
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
EQIX vs JNPR
Fortinet, Inc.
EQIX vs FTNT
Arista Networks, Inc.
EQIX vs ANET
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
EQIX vs LDOS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe EQIX can sustain its 47.7% EBITDA margin and improve ROIC from 6.7% without taking on materially more leverage, then holding or accumulating makes sense; otherwise, CSCO-implied valuation and DCF range both argue for caution because the current price implies rich expectations.
EQIX trades at a -37.9% downside to CSCO-based implied price, with current price $1,049.08 versus implied $651.58. The gap is driven by a much richer P/E on EQIX (76.2x) than CSCO (47.4x), despite EQIX showing a stronger EV/EBITDA multiple than CSCO.
Supporting Metrics
